The ideological construction of Africa in the British news.
Ideology defined
1. A unified set of ideas pertaining to a particular philosophy, especially political, ie, communism, fascism Socialism.
2. The consent of the people to accept taken-for-granted concepts. In this sense the workings of ideology go unnoticed, naturalised beliefs that come to be viewed as common-sense can be said to be working ideologically.
South Africa will often be the exception that proves the rule, because of its – until recently white domination and close association with the west.
By examining the representations of Sub-saharan Africa we can discover how these representations contribute to the shaping of popular knowledge.
We are concerned with the way in which the media builds (social) identities, social relations and systems of belief.
No media text exists in isolation. The ideological workings of the media are cumulative. All common-sense representations of Africa in the news are intertextually related to all the previous ‘African’ texts.
It is the intertextual ‘history’ that readers and writers draw upon in the interpretation and production of texts.
News Items on Africa constitute a relatively small proportion of total news. 4%
What subject matter do news items about Africa address ?
War, Famine, Disease etc
Within this narrow subject block certain themes (or propositions come to the fore). see below
The cumulative affect of a homogenous selection of regularly occurring subjects is the construction of a stereotypical representation of Africa in the minds of readers.
Heather Brookes has identified certain themes/propositions that exist in African news reporting.
Africans fight/kill each other.
Africans cannot negotiate/make peace
Africans are uncontrollably and excessively violent
Africans are helpless
Lots of people die in Africa
Africans do not respect Human Rights
Westerners are not safe in Africa/ Africans are dangerous.
Should the West help Africa
Going beyond these general themes, discourse analysis seeks to examine wording and syntactic structure.
Producers of texts lexicalize areas of experience by drawing on clusters of interrelated words and meanings.
Where a large concentration of interrelated terms occurs, this over-lexicalization indicates a key preoccupation of the society which produces the text.
Consider all the possible words for women
Consider all the possible words for black people.
By using interrelated terms certain words can replace others, offering a new naturalised yet ideologically potent common-sense understanding.
A good example is the naturalised reformulation of ‘loans’ to African states as ‘aid’ which obscures the exploitative nature of this phenomenon.
'French cut interest on Third World aid'
'Britain takes IMF line on aid to Africa'
Aid can even be substituted for ‘weapons’
'Bush seeking more aid for Angolan rebels'
'US weapons boost Angolan rebels'
These two headlines report the same event on the same day.
Other examples of naturalised reformulations are the regular use of ‘regime’ for ‘government’ and ‘tribal’ for all conflicts.
'Hopes of ceasefire grow in Liberian civil war'
Two days later
'Liberian talks fail to stem brutal tribal feud'
The latter is a completely reformulated and dominant view of conflict in Africa. It has a trivializing effect, portraying Africans as fighting for the sake of fighting.
No comments:
Post a Comment